|
We
parents still don't get it. We
still don't understand that our children live in a reality steeped in
violence, sex and the occult, and that they move and breathe and have
their being in a culture we would not have recognized even fifteen
years ago, one that has caused them untold
harm.
We
also don't get the fact that the series of Harry Potter books, lauded
by educators and parents, and bemusedly encouraged by religious commentators (except fundamentalists), not only
propagates occultism, but offers advanced indoctrination into
it.
That
said, if we step back from the controversy and look closely enough,
the series can offer us deep insights into the collective psyches of
our and our childrens' generations, both benumbed by addictions to fantasy, both psychologically stunted and ignorant of
spiritual truths.
Before
my audience is lost too, considering me a fear-mongering,
fundamentalist, unimaginative critic of the series, may
I introduce myself as a former New Age "healer" and advanced
yoga practitioner. Many of the delightfully described magical arts in the Harry
Potter series were pretty standard fare in training courses I mastered
to some degree or another, including telepathy, divination,
energy-work, necromancy, geomancy and time travel, to name but a few.
I was quite close friends with wizards, warlocks and witches
alike - all of us (psychologists, physicists, & other
professionals) being in the business of the new science of the mind,
defending our studies together as being of the white magic category,
much like the wizardry school of Harry Potter.
So, for those readers who believe Harry Potter's world to be a
harmless fantasy or the science of magic to be the stuff of educative fairy
tales, let me dispel those myths (no pun or magic intended) right up
front. And also let me
disabuse commentators of the notion that there are two kinds of magic,
however humorously depicted. There is one kind: variously known as black magic, occultism,
diabolism, or the dark arts.
And
while I am a revert to the Roman Catholic faith, I write about New Age topics out of first-hand
experience and by way of admonition, not fear.
I'd rather not have others suffer, as I did, from exposure to
the occult. To the charge
of fear-mongering, well, fear-mongering is not my cup of tea, although
I enjoy using the word. I
love words. I love fantasy and science fiction and C. S. Lewis and
Bradbury and Clarke and oh so many other writers who filled my mind
with wonder as a child, and yes, provided much
pleasure at breaking the bonds of my mundane, grown-up
infested universe. Truth
be told, I graduated from these authors in my early teens into more
meaty topics such as ESP, ghost hunting and parapsychology,
experimenting with Ouiji boards, telepathy games, and automatic
writing. Truth also be
told, I, like Harry, was also alienated from my caregivers, parents in
emotional trouble from years of marital separation.
These books fueled my need to have some control over my
out-of-control emotional world, they made me feel that there was a way
to escape, to be free, to fly. I
was not so very different from other children of my era who haunted
libraries and escaped through T.V. and who later became the perpetual adolescents of the '90s.
Neither was I so different from our children today, who now,
more than ever, lack control in their lives and need to feel in
control of their inner turmoil amidst divorce, latchkey-ism,
and out-of-control classrooms.
It's
not hard for either of us, parents or kids, to enjoy the marvelous
writing skills of J.K.
Rowling, being swept up by her characters and plots -
made all the more delicious because they are portrayed as part and parcel of the real world.
The words found in Harry Potter are endearing and all-together
enjoyable. Their effect
is another matter, precisely because of the wizard world's use of real
world magic, as well as our children's close identification with Harry
and their predisposition, wrought by over exposure to television, to attaching
themselves to his world. I
frequently recall an unattributed quote that reminds me of my descent
into the New Age and also of the future fate of children inured to the occult world found in Harry Potter.
Watch
your thoughts; they become words.
Watch
your words; they become actions.
Watch
your actions; they become habits.
Watch
your habits; they become character.
Watch
your character; it becomes your destiny.
Harry
Potter, to my mind, gives children a far from superficial exposure
to the use of magic.
It makes it fun and equates the learning of it with moral
rectitude. "Fiddle
sticks", you opine, "Harry Potter teaches marvelous lessons,
showing real life situations couched in harmless fantasy, to educate
my children in ethics. And
besides, I really enjoy reading it to them as they remind me of
Tolkein's and Lewis's fantasy worlds!"
To
the charge that Harry Potter teaches children moral lessons, I would
heartily agree it does promulgate lessons - but of the wrong kind.
In Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, for
example, Harry magically attacks a troublesome aunt by causing her to
blow up like a balloon - with no repercussions.
One of his teachers becomes an allay to Harry, relating to
him on the same level, showing a decided blurring of personal
boundaries not uncommon is today's high schools.
Emotion-sucking ghouls are depicted as handy prison guards and
the scenes of their near possessive attacks on children are uncannily
real. No clear cut right
and wrong lines here
Perhaps
the most revelatory aspect of the series is that Harry
and the rest of the wizard cohort view all non-magical adults, called
"Muggles", as stupid, antagonistic and not to be trusted.
The entire Muggle world is looked upon as archaic, even grossly
ignorant
- much the same way I viewed the orthodox religious world during my
time in the New Age. And
if defenders of the series supposed this to be a harmless conceit,
they need look no further than the author's own admonition to children
in an interview of her conducted by Scholastic (www. scholastic.com).
When asked to give a few closing words of advice to children, Rowling
warned, "Don't let the Muggles get you down."
Far from being an innocent magical spoof like the film "Princess
Bride", Potter magic is all too real and all too harmful.
Which
brings us to the author. Who
is she? A former teacher,
single parent and a long-time lover of books, we feel she is an
underdog of sorts. A
close reading of one of the books in the series, Harry Potter and
the Prisoner of Azkaban, however, by the eyes of a former
occultist like myself, reveals her more than cursory familiarity with
the occult. One character
is named Vablatsky (a play on the name of Madame Blavatsky, a
theosophist of the 19th century).
A class in "Transfiguration" (regardless of its
sacrilegious context for us Muggles) also hints at familiarity with
the "New Age" belief in stages of enlightenment, including
that of "transfiguration".
A closer reading might also reveal a woman author plagued by
the perpetual adolescence of the rest of her generation and with very
probable extracurricular interests in the occult.
Why
has Rowling so captured our imaginations?
Harry Potter books are a direct window into a preternatural
middle school society governed by control and manipulation - which is why it is so appealing to us in our topsy-turvy
adolescent culture. To
have a map where we can see people moving around us, to point
an effective wand at depression-inducing ghouls, to be able to
disappear under an invisibility cloak are all salves to our fearful
psyches. On the surface,
these exercises are a harmless cathartic, but, unfortunately, in
today's world, they are only blueprints for children to become further
detached from us.
A
case in point is Alan Jacobs, author of a
favorable review of Harry Potter in First Things. In his review, Professor Jacobs likens the science of wizardry
to the "technology" of the science of alchemy*. Another
case in point is a local Catholic nun in my community who runs a youth
camp and advertises solstice rituals in our church bulletins for kids
to enjoy. A Reiki healing
group, also linked to a local nun, is associated with our public hospital.
Reiki is a newer version of ritual Tantric magic.
In
our post-Christian culture, the occult sciences have gained legitimacy
under the rubric of energy technology.
This emphasis on technique and technology stems from the
industrial revolution and the belief in Hegel's perfectibility of man.
This concept of the perfect man, seized upon by Hitler to
justify a super race, is now finding ascendancy in the self
actualization movement know as the New Age.
Hitler's Nazi elite were themselves victims as children of what
is now termed radical attachment disorder, having been the product of
"new" thinking in strict and antiseptic child rearing techniques.
These children later grew into conscience-less supermen
with no hearts.
Attachment
disorder is much talked about these days, the latest in clinical
diagnoses, applied to such horrors as the mass murderers of Columbine.
These are youth that never attached emotionally to a parent,
either through multiple primary care givers, neglect or abuse.
These children suffer a core rage and an inability to develop
normal moral scruples. They
are children who often seek out violence and the occult to gain
control and to channel their rage.
Is there no truer representation of this than our orphan Harry
when he points his weapon of magic in rage at his aunt, or when he
stands in a dark "haunted" house confused as to who exactly killed his
parents and if he should kill him too?
Scripture
(excuse the reference) repeatedly refers to violence as the fruit and
destiny of the unjust and their children.
Our society condones violence, promiscuous sex and the occult
on every side. We walk on
a real world soil covered with the blood of millions and millions of
aborted children, the ultimate victims of attachment disorder.
And yet we remain in consummate denial, remaining addicted to a
violent media, occult gaming and books like Harry Potter.
As
my sister wrote to a young family, friends of hers, who are big fans of the
Harry Potter series, "the fallacy that magic is good is the chief
temptation for entry into the occult. Palmistry, astrology, fortune
telling, and divining are all of them objectively evil things and
sinful to indulge in. They
are violations of the First Commandment. The Church has always warned people not to give them
attention and to actively avoid them, as they are powerful and
seductive temptations. Why,
then, familiarize and desensitize your children to them by a deep and
attractive exposure to their supposed neutral use for good? I had
originally thought that the world of Harry Potter was an alternate
universe with a made up symbolic magic, much like Narnia. In that
case, I was prepared to see critics of the books as people who saw
Satan under every bed. But
that is not the case with the Potter universe, which is our world with
our common occult practices. "
As magic is to fantasy, so miracles are to our
very unhealed world. Our
children deserve better than this.
Why not soar with them by reading about the flying saints, like
Teresa of Avila or Teresita de los Andes?
Why not bilocate with them on the spiritual missions of Padre
Pio or St. Faustina? Why
not read to them about crippled children who run at
Lourdes or pray with them fantastically efficacious prayers that heal and
deliver? Our faith
provides all these marvelous tokens of true power for
which our children are starving.
We just need to be home long enough, and spend time enough with
them, and protect them clearly enough from false ideas to teach them the wonders of their faith.
Harry Potter and our children don't need magic.
They need love and the miracle of Jesus in the Eucharist and
yes, their parents, to keep them safe and secure and filled with true
wonder. So do we.
*Note: In a previously web-published version of this article, Dr. Jacobs was noted as being a professor of Wheaton College, (where some occult topics are the subject of study) located in Massachusetts, rather than his actual place of work, Wheaton College in Illinois (which is Christian). The author of this article regrets this error. The reference was based on an article as published by First Things in January 2000, entitled, "Harry Potter's Magic," wherein the location of Wheaton College was not indicated.
|
|